Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.36%. Comparing base (73447c9) to head (d942c46).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

❌ Your changes status has failed because you have indirect coverage changes. Learn more about Unexpected Coverage Changes and reasons for indirect coverage changes.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #76      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.70%   89.36%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines         903      903              
  Branches      207      207              
==========================================
- Hits          810      807       -3     
  Misses         21       21              
- Partials       72       75       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

If META.json is autogenerated taking the author commits than I think we should leave as it is, otherwise change to suse mail

It is auto-generated so I would leave it as-is unless we can fix what it does

Who can help me understand "codecov/changes
codecov/changes — 1 file has indirect coverage changes not visible in diff"?

It is related to this https://app.codecov.io/gh/openSUSE/Mojo-IOLoop-ReadWriteProcess/pull/76/indirect-changes

But I am wondering what does it means. I'm looking into https://docs.codecov.com/docs/unexpected-coverage-changes#how-to-find-the-root-cause

I don't know what code changes codecov is referring to but we need this change merged so that we can do a proper release. Merging.

See #77 about the coverage